I bought the Beenocam IP66 camera with limited expectations that it would work well, considering its price point and all the features it promises. We had recently bought an Arlo Pro 3 for three times the amount of this camera, and we were unhappy with the Arlo for several reasons, which I’ll compare. To summarize, the Beenocam is the clear winner between these two cameras, both in terms of price and functionality.
Recording and playing back videos: Arlo camera requires that you either pay for cloud service or purchase a separate hub, which costs over $80. The Beenocam does offer a cloud subscription, but also has a micro SD card option. We added a 512 GB card we had laying around to the Beenocam, and it’s working great.
Account sharing: When I tried to share the Arlo account, it completely blocked me out of using or viewing the camera, and it deleted all of our videos. All attempts to regain access failed. With the Beenocam, we both downloaded the app, and I was able to share the account with a quick QR code scan.
Power source and battery life: Arlo refused to work while charging and took forever to charge. It ran out of battery within a day. Arlo offers a solar panel charger accessory for $50 if you want to solar charge it. Beenocam came with a solar panel that has so far kept the battery charged even though we have it in a high-traffic area.
Connectivity: Arlo had connectivity issues. Beenocam has a consistently strong signal. Beenocam actually shows the live streaming speed, which averages 150 kbps for us and provides clear, real time live video.
Other things: Arlo Pro 3 is a floodlight camera, and the floodlight only worked while the camera recorded, meaning the floodlight would only turn on for 10 seconds if that’s how long you set your camera to record. That forced us to record long, pointless videos. Beenocam has a weak spotlight that isn’t intended to work as a floodlight. As a workaround, we bought a separate plug-in floodlight for $45 that’s working great. Beenocam has at least two features that the Arlo camera doesn’t: pan and 4K video. The Beenocam video quality is much better, and where we have it installed allows us to the pan the camera from the street to our backyard. Finally, I know it’s more minor, but Beenocam provided sticker mount diagrams, which made installation much faster than the Arlo install. I installed the Beenocam on our house in under 15 minutes, compared to the significantly more challenging install experience I had with the Arlo.
I know people love the Arlo Pro 3, so maybe I just had terrible luck with ours. However, even if the Arlo delivered on all its promised features, the Beenocam IP66 simply has it beat in terms of price and features. There’s just no comparison.
12/13/2023 UPDATE: Still working great a month in, the camera has very reliably provided live video and is recording videos into our SD card. Two things: sometimes the IP66 takes some time to provide live video. This normally resolves itself, but I turned the camera on and off once to make it work again. If you’ve used other Wi-Fi cameras, you know this is a common issue, and the IP66 is the most reliable camera we’ve had in this regard. The camera has been working fine for the past three weeks without me turning it off and on. Also, the app stopped providing me notifications of movement. Considering how high-traffic a spot we have it in, that’s probably a blessing – I’m sure I could get notifications to flood back in again if I wanted to do that. The solar panel has kept battery fully charged, even during these cloudy, rainy, short winter days. In sum, I’m still happy with this camera’s performance.
There are no reviews yet.